My yard is once more dry enough to walk across in ordinary shoes for the first time in over two months, one of my bee traps may have caught a swarm (dare I look?), and we’ve had a Summer, instead of the incessant drizzle characterising last year.
We have been graced by a visit from one of the Hares that inhabit my meadows and the ground has drained to the point where my wellingtons are no longer a necessity.
On the physical side, there are fence panels to be moved and fence posts to be pulled, weeding to be done and this Autumns replanting schedule to be planned. And I have begun to write in earnest once more. Only five hundred or so words a day, but that will do for the moment. I am far from the form that let me write around four thousand words a day, but now my time is more organised, that may not be outside the realms of possibility. Still. Baby steps.
‘Darkness between the Stars’ is finally taking a more coherent shape, but still a long way from completion. The narrative had become full of too many stray threads going nowhere and has needed multiple bypass operations to revive it. All in all it’s felt like an exercise in discontinuity. However, progress of a sort is progress, no matter what.
One of the things I will not be doing is using Long Language Modelling to complete the project. Mainly because I feel that using AI to write stories is not only cheating, but pretty low quality cheating at that. Yes, I’ve seen the plethora of AI written videos on YouTube and elsewhere, and the machine writing becomes very obvious within a few sentences. I won’t condemn it out of hand, but despite the quality of English these LLM’s are capable of there’s always something that feels out of tune. To extend the musical metaphor, their word music is technically perfect but just slightly off the beat. A demi quaver of a minim off key. Enough to scrape at the senses like fine sandpaper.
Hence the little symbol (See below) that I will be appending to the site. Just a little logo stating that no LLM or ‘Artificial Intelligence’ was used in the writing or construction of any of my work, such as it is. All the mistakes, typos, and failures of research in my work are entirely my own. The machines cannot replace humans because they lack biological inputs. They don’t have bad days, hangovers, or indigestion. Nor are they prey to all other biological stimuli, both internal and external. Machines cannot look at the moon and see wonder, or be inspired by nature. They lack intuition. Why? Because they are still binary code, unfeeling algorithms. Humans can feel, love, hate, envy, suffer and create. Machines merely make collages. Neat, well constructed collages, fast and precise, but no more than that.

I have heard it said that companies currently betting the farm on AI, having shed human workers to cut costs, are finding that while machines can deal with the mundane and repetitious, like production lines, humans are required as first line problem solvers able to empathise and provide value plus to a business. Which is causing the companies in question to lose out in certain situations. Therefore said companies are having to re-hire employees to fill in the empathy gaps.



